This is an extension of the ethics of automation. We should be tracking "time saved" as a net figure across everyone drawn into an automation. AI certainly exacerbates the issue in terms of saving one person's time by wasting time for potentially thousands of people. Even worse, it's left us double-guessing every piece of human communication because we've grown so suspicious of it being LLM-generated.
AI might save you time, but wastes somebody elses
14 Comments
This is one of the most honest takes on AI-assisted development I’ve seen in a while. You’ve named something that most teams are quietly experiencing but not discussing: the shift from 'AI saves me time' to 'AI saves me time, but costs my team cognitive overhead.'
The PR description issue is especially real. The AI sees the diff and summarizes it. But the reviewer needs to understand the intent—not the syntax. That requires context the AI doesn’t have and can’t infer. So the human still has to read the AI-generated wall, extract the signal, and then mentally reconstruct the missing context.
That’s not time saved. That’s time relocated.
The fix isn’t better prompting. It’s better tooling. The AI needs to understand product behavior, not just code deltas. And that means giving it access to product requirements, design docs, and system context—not just the repository.
Until then, the cognitive cost is just being shifted, not eliminated.
Great write-up. This conversation needs to keep happening.
@[Jakub Neruda] I’ll take that as a compliment—you’re right that it’s clean and structured. But I can assure you, no AI was used to generate that comment.
I’ve been building sovereign AI systems for the last 84 days on a Chromebook with $0 budget. I read your post because it resonated with a problem I’ve lived. I responded because I’ve been in those meetings too, watching the same cognitive drain happen.
The fact that my reply reads cleanly isn’t because it was generated—it’s because I’ve been writing architectural explanations daily for months.
That said, I appreciate the skepticism. The more AI-generated noise floods the platform, the harder it is to trust what you're reading. I respect that you're paying attention.
@[SCURA] This isn't as much about clean structure, rather than figures of speech. Like:
"That’s not time saved. That’s time relocated."
"Great write-up. This conversation needs to keep happening."
These kinds of sentences started appearing in comments an articles in the past two years or so. I was ignoring it at the beginning, but these days most of the articles/comments here and on Medium sound very genAI, and they instanly make me stop reading.
It is annoying at this point. If you really wrote that comment yourself, you might want to revise your writing style to sound more human.
Please log in to add a comment.
This hits on something I keep running into. The problem is not verbosity per se, it is abstraction level mismatch. The AI describes what it did at the code level, but the reader needs product level signal. I ran into the same pattern when building Opportunity Skill, where agent generated impressions of a user had to stay under 512 characters. That constraint forces the agent to extract what actually matters instead of summarising everything. Compact structured units beat walls of text every time someone downstream has to parse them.
Please log in to add a comment.
I think this is an important conversation because there are really two different questions hiding underneath it.
The first is whether AI saves time for the individual using it.
The second is whether it transfers hidden costs somewhere else in the system.
I've seen examples of both. Sometimes AI genuinely eliminates work. Other times it simply shifts the effort from creation to review, debugging, verification, or maintenance.
To me, the interesting engineering question isn't "Does AI save time?" It's "Where did the work move?"
Understanding that redistribution of effort is probably more useful than treating AI as either a productivity miracle or a productivity disaster. In practice, it seems capable of being both, depending on where you measure the cost.
Please log in to add a comment.
Please log in to comment on this post.
More Posts
- © 2026 Coder Legion
- Feedback / Bug
- Privacy
- About Us
- Contacts
- You Tube
- Premium Subscription
- Terms of Service
- Early Builders
More From Jakub Neruda
Related Jobs
- Bilingual Store Associate (Spanish)Sherwin-Williams · Full time · Hagerstown, MD
- Part-Time Center AssociateThe UPS Store 5064 · Full time · Hagerstown, MD
- Senior Informatica Developer with Admin Skills || Montreal, QC - Onsite || Fulltime FTEAcestack · Full time · Canada
Commenters (This Week)
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!