What code review process do you use for AI-generated code?

posted Originally published at dev.to 1 min read

I have been thinking about this a lot lately.

As AI tools become part of daily development, generating code is getting easier. But reviewing that code properly is still very important.

I want to learn how other developers handle this.

When AI generates code for you, what review process do you follow before you keep it?

I am interested in questions like:

  • Do you review everything line by line?
  • Do you trust AI for boilerplate only, or also for business logic?
  • What do you check first: correctness, security, performance, readability, or architecture?
  • Do you use a checklist?
  • How do you catch subtle bugs or bad assumptions?

My rough thinking is something like this:

  • understand the code fully before keeping it
  • verify logic against requirements
  • test happy path and edge cases
  • check security and performance concerns
  • refactor to match project standards
  • never merge code only because “it works”

I would really like to hear practical workflows from real developers and teams.

What is your process for reviewing AI-generated code?

More Posts

I’m a Senior Dev and I’ve Forgotten How to Think Without a Prompt

Karol Modelskiverified - Mar 19

TypeScript Complexity Has Finally Reached the Point of Total Absurdity

Karol Modelskiverified - Apr 23

Your AI Doesn't Just Write Tests. It Runs Them Too.

Kevin Martinez - May 12

Why Prompt Engineering Is Just an Expensive Way to Be Incompetent

Karol Modelskiverified - May 21

How Do You Measure Whether Someone Is Actually Good at Working With AI?

snapsynapse - May 1
chevron_left

Related Jobs

View all jobs →

Commenters (This Week)

13 comments
1 comment

Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!