Comprehensive Guide to Mastering User Experience Design Through AI-Driven Curriculum Design

posted 3 min read

This prompt is designed to guide you through creating a robust educational framework for a User Experience Design course, leveraging AI to embody principles of epistemology and philosophy of education. It provides a structured, step-by-step process to develop course outcomes, skills, and learning modules, ensuring alignment with pedagogical standards and cognitive frameworks.


Phase 1: Defining Course Outcomes and Key Skills

Step 1: Establish and Validate Course Outcomes

The AI will:

  • Define clear Course Outcomes for a User Experience Design course.
  • Validate each outcome against epistemological (knowledge theory) and educational standards.
  • Categorize outcomes using Bloom’s Taxonomy to reflect cognitive complexity.
  • Assign an epistemological basis (Pragmatic, Critical, or Reflective) to each outcome.
  • Ensure alignment with established pedagogical principles.

Output Format: A plain-text, terminal-style table with the following columns:

  • Outcome Number (e.g., Outcome 1)
  • Proposed Course Outcome (description of the outcome)
  • Cognitive Domain (Bloom’s Taxonomy level, e.g., Analysis, Synthesis)
  • Epistemological Basis (Pragmatic, Critical, Reflective)
  • Educational Validation (how the outcome aligns with pedagogical standards)

Next Step: The AI will prompt for confirmation to proceed to Step 2.

Step 2: Identify and Validate Key Skills

The AI will:

  • Identify 2–4 key skills per course outcome that demonstrate its achievement.
  • Validate each skill against epistemological and educational frameworks.
  • Ensure skills reflect the cognitive complexity and epistemological depth of their associated outcome.
  • Number skills hierarchically (e.g., Skill 1.1, Skill 1.2 for Outcome 1).

Output Format: A plain-text, terminal-style table with the following columns:

  • Skill Number (e.g., Skill 1.1)
  • Key Skill Description (detailed explanation of the skill)
  • Associated Outcome (linked course outcome)
  • Cognitive Domain (Bloom’s Taxonomy level)
  • Epistemological Basis (Procedural, Instrumental, or Normative)
  • Educational Validation (alignment with adult learning and competency-based principles)

Next Step: The AI will prompt for confirmation to proceed to Step 3.

Step 3: Ensure Pedagogical Alignment

The AI will:

  • Map course outcomes to their supporting skills to ensure a cohesive curriculum.
  • Provide traceability between outcomes and skills for clarity and coherence.
  • Justify how skills enable meaningful achievement of outcomes through epistemological and pedagogical alignment.

Output Format: A plain-text, terminal-style table with the following columns:

  • Outcome Number (e.g., Outcome 1)
  • Outcome Description (summary of the outcome)
  • Supporting Skill(s) (e.g., Skill 1.1, 1.2)
  • Justification (explanation of alignment and how skills support outcome achievement)

Next Step: The AI will prompt for confirmation to proceed to Phase 2.


Phase 2: Designing Learning Modules and Activities

The AI will request confirmation to begin Phase 2. For each skill identified in Phase 1, it will create a learning module with the following components:

  1. Skill Number and Title: A concise, descriptive title for the module.
  2. Objective: A clear statement of what learners will achieve.
  3. Content: In-depth content (500+ words) covering the skill, including explanations, examples, and connections to the associated course outcome.
  4. Knowledge Claims: A set of foundational knowledge claims underpinning the module content, validated against epistemological and educational standards to ensure reliability and pedagogical soundness.
  5. Reasoning and Assumptions: A transparent explanation of the reasoning and assumptions behind the module’s design and content.
  6. Interactive Activities: Engaging, interactive exercises (simulated via a command-line interface in plain text, using ASCII for tables, graphs, etc.) to reinforce learning objectives. The AI will:
    • Present the activity and wait for user input.
    • Provide feedback on responses and repeat until mastery is achieved.
  7. Assessment: An interactive method to evaluate learner understanding (simulated via a command-line interface with ASCII visuals). The AI will:
    • Present the assessment and wait for user input.
    • Provide feedback and repeat until mastery is achieved.

Next Step: After completing each module, the AI will prompt for confirmation to proceed to the next module.

Process Note: The AI follows a strict sequential progression, ensuring no steps are skipped or reordered for a logical and coherent curriculum design experience.


Why Use This Prompt?

This structured approach ensures a robust, pedagogically sound curriculum for User Experience Design, grounded in epistemological principles and cognitive frameworks like Bloom’s Taxonomy. Whether you’re an educator, instructional designer, or learner, this prompt provides a comprehensive framework to build or understand a high-quality UX design course.


P.S. Level Up Your Prompt Engineering!

If you enjoy crafting prompts or want to optimize your AI interactions, check out Corecraft and Link-Trim, tools I’m developing to help you refine, evaluate, and enhance your prompts for smarter, clearer AI responses. You can explore curated prompt collections, save your best prompts, and learn proven techniques to improve your results. It’s still in early development, but it’s already helping users elevate their AI experience. Visit Corecraft to learn more and share your feedback!

If you read this far, tweet to the author to show them you care. Tweet a Thanks

Impressive work—this prompt is incredibly detailed and thoughtfully structured! It really makes you think about how AI can support deep curriculum design. Have you tested how well learners respond to the interactive CLI-based modules in practice, especially in terms of engagement and retention?

More Posts

Human Insight in an AI-Driven Job Market

Pavel Rahman - Jul 10

The Secret Weapon for Java Developers Building with AI

myfear - Mar 18

Explore vibe coding: an AI-driven, natural language approach to rapid software development.

Gaurav Gaur - Jun 23

An internal AI implementation is not a weekend hackathon project.

Nikhilesh Tayal - Aug 26

AI: An Engineer’s Ally, Not a Replacement

Vladimir Semenov - Jul 18
chevron_left