Nice build! How well does it scale as the dataset grows?
I Built a Job Listing + E-commerce API Dataset in 4 Hours, No Code
9 Comments
@[fedorqui] Good question. Right now it's built for the "personal/small team dataset" use case, think hundreds to low thousands of rows per dataset, not warehouse-scale. Refreshes and diffs are versioned per run, so the more history you keep the more storage it uses, but querying stays fast since each version is just a snapshot. Haven't stress-tested it past that yet, happy to hear what scale you're thinking of.
Please log in to add a comment.
@[Domharvest] Honestly, thin right now, it's early and I've been focused on getting the core extraction + versioning right first. Fair callout though, I'll be adding proper test coverage as it matures. If you're asking because you're evaluating it for something specific, curious what you'd want tested most.
@[Domharvest] Fair point, and I hear you on tests being part of the product from day one, not an afterthought. Where I'm at right now: I've manually verified the core paths pretty thoroughly, but you're right that manual testing doesn't catch what automated tests catch, especially around security and edge cases, and it doesn't scale as the codebase grows.
Realistic answer: I'm one person, moving fast to validate the idea has real users first, and building out proper test coverage as a follow-up once I know what's worth hardening. Not saying that's the ideal order, just the honest tradeoff at this stage. Appreciate you pushing on it though, it's the kind of thing easy to deprioritize when you're solo.
Please log in to add a comment.
The MCP server angle is smart, making data agent-accessible removes a real friction layer. But job listings are still a display format even when an agent can query them. The listing says what the employer posted, not whether it fits the person searching. This is the exact gap Opportunity Skill addresses with its human discovery module, where the agent describes what someone actually needs in natural language and gets semantic matches against structured impressions rather than keyword hits on job titles.
@[QuestMeet] That's a fair distinction. Right now Quorel gives you the structured, versioned data, what the agent does with it (matching, ranking, filtering by fit) is really up to whatever's built on top. The MCP angle is meant to make that layer easier to build, not to replace it. Sounds like Opportunity Skill is solving the matching problem specifically, that's a different layer than what I'm doing here. Would be curious how you're handling the semantic matching side.
Please log in to add a comment.
Please log in to comment on this post.
More Posts
- © 2026 Coder Legion
- Feedback / Bug
- Privacy
- About Us
- Contacts
- Premium Subscription
- Terms of Service
- Early Builders
More From Raphael
Related Jobs
- Cloud API EngineerBitdeer · Full time · Singapore
- Software Engineer, Rapid Response Assignment - UKTen Eleven Ventures · Full time · United Kingdom
- Engineering - ElevenAPIValor Capital Group · Full time · United Kingdom
Commenters (This Week)
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!