Nice write up. Why did you choose React Router v7 over Next.js for this project?
How I Built a 144-Page Static Site for Game Players — React Router v7 SSG Deep Dive
2 Comments
@[Sajal Kanti] Good question. Three reasons:
SSG without the runtime. Next.js pre-renders static pages but still ships a server runtime — even with
output: export, you lose ISR, middleware, and a bunch of the ecosystem that makes Next worth using. RRv7 withssr:false + prerender()gives me 144 dead HTML files and zero Node.js on the server. Caddy does the rest. No hydration mismatch, no serverless cold starts, no framework runtime to patch.Content-heavy = render-once. This site has 100+ article pages that change maybe once a week. There's zero reason to serve those pages dynamically. RRv7's prerender pipeline generates them at build time in ~30 seconds. I deploy the static files and forget about them.
Simpler mental model. Next.js has pages router vs. app router, server components vs. client components, caching layers that changed three times in the last year. RRv7's loader/action model maps cleanly to what I actually need: load data, render HTML, ship it. No "use client" directives, no edge runtime vs. node runtime decisions, no RSC payloads to debug.
If my site needed SSR for auth-gated pages or real-time data, I'd reconsider Next. For a content-heavy static site, RRv7 is the simpler tool that does less — and that's exactly what I wanted.
Please log in to add a comment.
Please log in to comment on this post.
More Posts
- © 2026 Coder Legion
- Feedback / Bug
- Privacy
- About Us
- Contacts
- Premium Subscription
- Terms of Service
- Early Builders
Related Jobs
- Unreal 5 Technical Artist - Black Ember GamesXsolla · Full time · Germany
- Angular Developer 3 - OnsiteBass Pro Shops · Full time · Springfield, MO
- Full Stack Developer (Onsite)Greenlight Workforce Solutions Inc · Full time · Miami, FL
Commenters (This Week)
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!