This is a refreshing angle. Most AI safety discussions focus on model guardrails, but the attacker is usually the human, not the model. Treating social engineering and behavioral manipulation as first-class signals makes a lot of sense. Curious to see how AURA evolves and how it performs against real-world prompt injection attempts. Nice work!
AURA (AI User Risk Assessment): A behavioral threat-intelligence framework for AI Safety
2 Comments
@[buildbasekit] Hi Amit! Thank you so much for your feedback and support.
You’ve hit the nail on the head. We spend so much time trying to make models 'smarter' by setting strict, black-and-white rules of what is forbidden and what is allowed. But in reality, there is so much more grey, and AI simply doesn't know how to navigate it. That's why static 'defense bans' keep failing—they forget how easily human psychology bypasses rigid technical boundaries.
AURA was designed to catch these subtle shifts in user behavior—like emotional pressure, false urgency, or fake authority—before they even reach the core logic. This approach is rooted in exactly what helped me navigate high-pressure, real-world situations with real people in my past career. I really hope this behavioral angle can contribute to how we train and secure AI.
Thanks for being here since the very beginning of this journey!
Please log in to add a comment.
Please log in to comment on this post.
More Posts
- © 2026 Coder Legion
- Feedback / Bug
- Privacy
- About Us
- Contacts
- Premium Subscription
- Terms of Service
- Refund
- Early Builders
More From kate8382
Related Jobs
- Software Engineer, Test & Infrastructure II (Bilingual Spanish)Vail Systems · Full time · Springfield, IL
- .NET Full Stack Developer ( Risk / Lending)Computer Task Group · Full time · Atlanta, GA
- User Interface (UI) Software Developer IIIOmega Solutions Inc · Full time · Princeton, NJ
Commenters (This Week)
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!