ForgeZero 4.1 vs GNU Make: Up to 4.5x Faster Build Performance

ForgeZero 4.1 vs GNU Make: Up to 4.5x Faster Build Performance

26 38 81
calendar_todayschedule2 min read
— Originally published at dev.to

ForgeZero 4.1 vs GNU Make: Up to 4.5x Faster Build Performance

I've been working on ForgeZero, a modern build system designed to replace traditional make with a faster, zero-config approach.

With the release of ForgeZero 4.1, I benchmarked it against GNU Make on multiple machines to answer one simple question:

Can a modern build system still significantly outperform make in 2025?

Turns out: yes.


Benchmark setup

GNU Make

make -j4

ForgeZero

./fzt -dir . -out fz_out

Measurement tool

Benchmarks were run using hyperfine:

hyperfine './fzt -dir . -out fz_out' 'make -j4'

Image description


Results

Platform ForgeZero GNU Make Speedup
Ryzen 9 7950X3D (KVM, 1 vCPU) ~80–84 ms ~350–364 ms 4.1x–4.5x
Intel Core i5-10310U 82.2 ms 291.1 ms 3.54x
AMD FX-8370E (AM3+) 111.0 ms 238.5 ms 2.15x

Across very different CPUs and environments, ForgeZero consistently outperformed GNU Make.


Example benchmark output

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Benchmark 1: ./fzt -dir . -out fz_out
Time (mean ± σ): 84.5 ms ± 7.6 ms

Benchmark 2: make -j4
Time (mean ± σ): 350.4 ms ± 16.4 ms

Summary:
4.14x faster than make -j4

Intel i5-10310U

Benchmark 1: ./fzt -dir . -out fz_out
Time (mean ± σ): 82.2 ms ± 4.2 ms

Benchmark 2: make -j4
Time (mean ± σ): 291.1 ms ± 11.2 ms

Summary:
3.54x faster than make -j4

AMD FX-8370E

Benchmark 1: ./fzt -dir . -out fz_out
Time (mean ± σ): 111.0 ms ± 17.9 ms

Benchmark 2: make -j4
Time (mean ± σ): 238.5 ms ± 24.4 ms

Summary:
2.15x faster than make -j4

Why is ForgeZero faster?

1. No shell overhead

GNU Make spends a surprising amount of time spawning shell processes (fork/exec) for build commands.

ForgeZero executes the build pipeline directly.

No unnecessary shell orchestration.


2. Lightweight dependency graph

make still carries decades of legacy behavior:

  • Makefile parsing
  • implicit rules
  • pattern matching
  • recursive variable expansion

ForgeZero builds a direct dependency graph and updates only what actually changed.


3. Better task scheduling

Instead of the classic make -j job model, ForgeZero uses a lightweight internal scheduler with lower synchronization overhead.


4. Zero-config design

No giant Makefiles.

No boilerplate.

ForgeZero analyzes project structure automatically and starts building immediately.


Why this matters

make was introduced in 1976.

Almost 50 years later, many developers still accept build-system latency as unavoidable.

These benchmarks suggest otherwise.

If your team runs hundreds of builds per day—locally and in CI—even saving 100–250 ms per build adds up quickly.


ForgeZero 4.1 is available

GitHub:

https://github.com/forgezero-cli/forgezero

I'd love feedback from developers still using make, ninja, or other build systems.

1 Comment

1 vote
🔥 Join developers growing publicly
Share your knowledge, build in public, and grow your developer presence with a global community.

More Posts

Kamal vs Kubernetes: An Honest Comparison for Teams Who Don’t Need 1,000 Services

Alexandre Vazquez - Jul 24

Europe Just Dropped the Hammer on AI: A Wake-Up Call?

PrabashanaDev - Jul 15

How Lighthouse Performance Scores Are Recorded and Calculated

ApogeeWatcherverified - Aug 18

How to Build a Portfolio Website That Actually Gets You Hired

muhammadfarhan.dev - Aug 21

Comparison: Universal Import vs. Plaid/Yodlee

Pocket Portfolio - Mar 12
chevron_left
3k Points145 Badges
Canadat.co/4fpTf3dL1D
28Posts
50Comments
9Connections
Writing ForgeZero: Fixing the mess of modern build systems.
Performance overhead is my personal ene... Show more

Related Jobs

View all jobs →

Commenters (This Week)

5 comments
1 comment
1 comment

Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!