I get the idea, but this feels pretty heavy infra wise. Is the added complexity actually worth it vs improving existing IAM monitoring?
Defending the JVM in the Agentic Era
2 Comments
wanderer
•
webMethodMan
•
@[wanderer] It really depends on the risks if an agent decides, for example, delete the entire production database and all the backups. Maybe the agent needs to be able to create and drop temp tables. Traditional RBAC would grant the agent role create and drop table permissions. The T=0 approach asks "can this agent perform this action right now?", and if the answer is no, the call is never executed.
Please log in to add a comment.
🔥 Join developers growing publicly
Share your knowledge, build in public, and grow your developer presence with a global community.
Please log in to comment on this post.
More Posts
- © 2026 Coder Legion
- Feedback / Bug
- Privacy
- About Us
- Contacts
- Premium Subscription
- Terms of Service
- Early Builders
chevron_left
12Posts
13Comments
8Connections
Hybrid AI survivor and webMethodMan. Helping architects, execs, and builders turn messy integration into strategy.
More From webMethodMan
Related Jobs
- Manager, Technical Product Enablement and Specialist Sales (Digital and Agentic)Mastercard · Full time · Australia
- Software Engineer, Test & Infrastructure II (Bilingual Spanish)Vail Systems · Full time · Springfield, IL
- Director- Agentic Solutions IntegrationMastercard · Full time · Poland
Commenters (This Week)
Hussein Mahdi
5 comments
Alex
1 comment
amanwebsolution
1 comment
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!