I get the idea, but this feels pretty heavy infra wise. Is the added complexity actually worth it vs improving existing IAM monitoring?
Defending the JVM in the Agentic Era
2 Comments
wanderer
•
webMethodMan
•
@[wanderer] It really depends on the risks if an agent decides, for example, delete the entire production database and all the backups. Maybe the agent needs to be able to create and drop temp tables. Traditional RBAC would grant the agent role create and drop table permissions. The T=0 approach asks "can this agent perform this action right now?", and if the answer is no, the call is never executed.
Please log in to add a comment.
🔥 Join developers growing publicly
Share your knowledge, build in public, and grow your developer presence with a global community.
Please log in to comment on this post.
More Posts
- © 2026 Coder Legion
- Feedback / Bug
- Privacy
- About Us
- Contacts
- Premium Subscription
- Terms of Service
- Refund
- Early Builders
chevron_left
11Posts
12Comments
7Connections
Hybrid AI survivor and webMethodMan. Helping architects, execs, and builders turn messy integration into strategy.
More From webMethodMan
Related Jobs
- Machine Learning Engineer with an Agentic FocusHigh 5 Games · Full time · United States
- Applied AI Engineer (Agentic AI) - CalgaryOutlier AI · Full time · Canada
- Agentic AI Technical Mentorjobgether · Temporary · India
Commenters (This Week)
VeritasLab
26 comments
Matt Allford
2 comments
Emmanuel Cortes
1 comment
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!