Nice idea.
But once agents start handling payments, it’s less about speed and more about control.
Who verifies the decision before the money actually moves?
Feels like automation needs a matching layer of validation here.
Hey @[Fady-Desoky-Saeed-Abdelaziz], great point!
You're absolutely right that once agents start moving money, speed takes a backseat to control. In my research, the systems that work best implement what I call "verified thresholds" - where transactions under a certain amount ($10-20 typically) can flow automatically, but anything larger triggers a quick verification ping.
The validation layer is crucial! What I've seen working well is:
The Portland chain I mentioned? They actually fixed their hallucination issue by adding a simple two-factor check for discounts of 20%.
Sometimes the smartest solution is the simplest one!
Would love to hear what validation approaches you've seen work in your experience!
@[Gimi] That’s a really solid framing — especially the idea of “verified thresholds”.
What I find interesting is that most of these approaches (thresholds, confirmations, patterns) are still reactive.
Feels like the harder problem is catching intent drift early — when the agent is still “technically correct” but already deviating from what the user actually meant.
Almost like validation shouldn’t just be before execution, but continuously watching how decisions evolve.
Curious if you’ve seen anything that works well for that, or if it’s still mostly threshold-based today.
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!