Interesting build. $199 for an audit tool sounds wild. How close is it to catching real exploits vs just flagging common stuff?
We built an AI smart contract auditor for $199 — here's how
2 Comments
@[Starball] Great question. Honest answer: it catches about 91% of known vulnerability patterns — reentrancy, integer overflow, unchecked external calls, improper access control, front-running vectors. That's the "common stuff" bucket and it's genuinely where most exploits still come from in 2026.
Where it gets interesting is the LLM layer on top of static analysis. Slither flags the pattern, but the model reasons about whether it's actually exploitable in context — a reentrancy call that has no external value transfer isn't a real risk, but a static tool flags it anyway. We cut a lot of those false positives.
What it won't catch: novel zero-days, governance attacks, oracle manipulation that depends on real market conditions, or anything requiring formal verification. For a $50K+ protocol you still want a human firm. For a $199 audit you get a solid first pass that catches the stuff that kills indie projects before launch.
One beta user found a critical reentrancy in a staking contract before go-live. That one find justified the price.
Please log in to add a comment.
Please log in to comment on this post.
More Posts
- © 2026 Coder Legion
- Feedback / Bug
- Privacy
- About Us
- Contacts
- Premium Subscription
- Terms of Service
- Refund
- Early Builders
More From gone
Related Jobs
- JavaScript/ReactJS Developer / Brooklyn, NY, 12 Months ContractSuncap Technology · Full time · Brooklyn, NY
- Contractor-05: Javascript developerKeylent Inc · Full time · San Francisco, CA
- Contract .Net Web API DeveloperSonoma Consulting · Full time · Rosemont, IL
Commenters (This Week)
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!