Lessons from a Year of Side Projects: What Actually Worked (and What Didn’t)

posted 2 min read

Over the past year, I’ve built more side projects than I can count. Some made it to launch. Most didn’t. A few gained traction. One or two even brought in a little revenue. But the honest truth? The majority just vanished — as if they never existed.

Here are the most valuable (and rarely talked about) lessons I’ve learned along the way:

1. Impressive ≠ Useful

One of my earliest projects was an AI-powered researcher agent — it could scrape academic papers, summarize findings, and generate insights in seconds. I was proud of it. I believed it would catch fire.

I launched it.
The response? A few “cool” comments. That’s it. No one stuck around.

Turns out, looking impressive isn’t the same as being needed. People didn’t have a strong enough reason to come back.

2. Technical Brilliance Doesn’t Guarantee Adoption

At one point, I challenged myself to build an AI-powered resume maker with job-hunting integration. It crafted tailored resumes, matched users to job listings, and even suggested cover letters. I went deep — natural language processing, job board APIs, sleek UI, and more. It was one of the most advanced things I’d ever coded.

But I was solving problems for myself, not users. There was no real demand, no organic interest.
Eventually, I burned out — even though the project was technically beautiful. Even hired interns for it. Still didn’t take off.

3. Cutting-Edge AI Won’t Save a Useless Product

I’ve worked with advanced models — building an AI post writer for social media that generated viral-ready captions, hashtags, and even scheduled posts. The tech was cool.

But “cool” doesn’t pay the bills. If you’re not solving a real pain point, people won’t care. You can pile on all the AI buzzwords you want — it won’t matter without genuine utility.

4. The Simplicity That Worked: A Telegram Bot

Ironically, the simplest project I launched — a Telegram-based NSFW AI chatbot — became the most successful.

No major announcements. No public launch. Just a quiet drop in a few private WhatsApp groups.
But it spread via word of mouth. Slowly and steadily. No hype, just use.

I almost didn’t ship it. I worried it was “too simple” or wouldn’t reflect well on my portfolio.
Now? It’s the only project I actively track. Over 700 active users. 80+ paying subscribers. Still small — but growing every week.

Final Lesson: Shipping > Perfection

It’s easy to get caught up in polish, complexity, or cleverness. But those things don’t matter if the product doesn’t pull people in.

What matters most is:

  • Shipping fast
  • Listening hard
  • Staying in the game

Perfection is a moving target. Momentum and real user feedback beat theory and polish every single time.

If you read this far, tweet to the author to show them you care. Tweet a Thanks
0 votes
0 votes
0 votes
0 votes

More Posts

What Is Vibe Coding? The Future of Developer Experience

Code Inception - Jul 26

Cranes, Arches, and the End of Capitalism: What Software Development Reveals About the Future We Are Building

Landon - Mar 31

AI Coding Tools in 2025: What's Hot, What's Hype, and What's Actually Useful

Mayank - Jul 5

Most AI projects fail because companies try to boil the ocean instead of solving one simple problem.

Tom Smith - Sep 9

Unlocking New Horizons: What GitHub Copilot Teaches Us About the Future of Code

Sunny - Oct 3
chevron_left