Ever pushed code thinking, “This should be safe”… and moved on?

Leader posted 1 min read

Most teams do.

Because realistically:

  • You don’t have time to review every edge case

  • Security audits are expensive and slow

  • And if something really critical existed… surely someone would’ve caught it by now

Right?

Here’s the uncomfortable truth:

Some vulnerabilities sit in production code for 5, 10, even 20+ years - completely unnoticed.

Not because people are careless.

But because finding them is genuinely hard.

Now here comes a new AI model - Claude Mythos Preview

What it found is…:

  • A 27-year-old bug in OpenBSD (an OS known for security)

  • A 16-year-old vulnerability in FFmpeg, one of the most widely used media libraries

  • Multiple Linux kernel privilege escalation paths

These aren’t obscure hobby projects.

These are battle-tested, heavily audited systems.

However, what I see this is a double-edge sword:

If you could use it, so could the attacker

The bottleneck will no longer be finding vulnerabilities

It’s who finds them first - attackers or defenders

But do you think, are we entering a world where software gets stress-tested at scale, automatically?

2 Comments

2 votes
1

More Posts

I’m a Senior Dev and I’ve Forgotten How to Think Without a Prompt

Karol Modelskiverified - Mar 19

Just completed another large-scale WordPress migration — and the client left this

saqib_devmorph - Apr 7

Your AI Doesn't Just Write Tests. It Runs Them Too.

Kevin Martinez - May 12

Systems Thinking: Thriving in the Third Golden Age of Software

Tom Smithverified - Apr 15

Split-Brain: Analyst-Grade Reasoning Without Raw Transactions on the Server

Pocket Portfolioverified - Apr 8
chevron_left

Related Jobs

View all jobs →

Commenters (This Week)

6 comments
2 comments
1 comment

Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!