Makes a lot of sense, treating reviews as learning opportunities instead of QA checkpoints could shift team culture.
AI Code Reviews Are Backwards (Do This Instead)
pachecoioverifiedBackerLeader
posted
Originally published at sudoish.com
2 min read
2 Comments
JAgostoni
•
No AI reviewer without human review
Totally. I use Gemini's GitHub add-in to run code reviews. It find a ton of stuff for sure but then you get hit with a reality check. For example, I was using a hardcoded year range (2025-2026) in the code and instead of Gemini complaining about the hardcoding it simply indicated that this was wrong because it was using a future year. It's proposed fix was to change it to 2023 (the knowledge cutoff at that time).
Needed to review the review at that point.
Please log in to add a comment.
Please log in to comment on this post.
More Posts
- © 2026 Coder Legion
- Feedback / Bug
- Privacy
- About Us
- Contacts
- Premium Subscription
- Terms of Service
- Refund
- Early Builders
chevron_left
More From pachecoio
Related Jobs
- IOS Developer (iPad, X Code, XMLJSON Parsing) | HybridSamprasoft · Full time · Sunnyvale, CA
- IOS Developer (Xcode, Swift, Objective-C) | Hybrid - Sunnyvale, CASamprasoft · Full time · Sunnyvale, CA
- PHP Developer - Laravel, CodeigniterGlobalsoftwaresolution · Full time · California, MO
Commenters (This Week)
LegendsDaD
1 comment
automatelab
1 comment
Nikhilesh Tayal
1 comment
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!