The post compares G1, ZGC, and Shenandoah Java garbage collectors.

The post compares G1, ZGC, and Shenandoah Java garbage collectors.

Leader posted Originally published at dev.to 2 min read

G1 vs ZGC vs Shenandoah: The Best Java Garbage Collector for Large Heaps (2025 Guide)

TL;DR:

If your heap exceeds 50 GB, you need a GC strategy.

G1 — good default, balanced performance
⚡ Shenandoah — ultra-low pause times
ZGC — built for terabyte-scale heaps

What Is Garbage Collection and Why It Matters for Modern Java

Garbage collection (GC) automatically reclaims memory in Java applications — but once your heap grows beyond a few dozen gigabytes, GC pauses can cause serious latency spikes.

As enterprise apps, integration layers, and AI workloads scale up, pause time predictability becomes just as critical as throughput.

That’s why the latest OpenJDK releases include three advanced collectors tuned for performance at scale:

  • G1 (Garbage-First GC)
  • Shenandoah
  • GC ZGC (Z Garbage Collector)

These collectors share one goal: handle massive heaps with minimal pause time — but they get there in very different ways.

✅ Best for most apps: G1
⚡ Best for near-real-time systems: Shenandoah
Best for hyperscale: ZGC

How Modern GC Enables Scalable Integration

Today’s integration platforms — event-driven systems, API gateways, AI inference pipelines — all depend on JVM performance somewhere in the stack.

Tuned garbage collection directly impacts:

  • API and message latency
  • Real-time data throughput
  • AI inference and orchestration timing
  • System reliability under heavy load

That’s why understanding GC tuning is part of the Integration Renaissance — where hybrid cloud, AI, and architecture converge.

Practical GC Optimization Tips

  1. Fix your heap size
    Use -Xms = -Xmx for predictable allocation and reduced resizing overhead.

  2. Monitor pause distributions
    Averages hide spikes. Track max pause and frequency histograms.

  3. Use realistic workloads
    Synthetic GC benchmarks rarely mirror real-world application pressure.

  4. Tune region size (G1) or thresholds (Shenandoah)
    Small tweaks in region layout can dramatically reduce compaction pauses.

Further Reading and Deep Dives

If you want to explore the details — metrics, tuning examples, and JVM internals — check out these in-depth articles on IBM Community:

G1: The Original GC for Large Heaps

Shenandoah: Very Low Pause GC for Mountains of Data

ZGC: Taming Terabytes

And the complete overview that started it all:
G1, ZGC, and Shenandoah: OpenJDK’s Garbage Collectors for Very Large Heaps

If you read this far, tweet to the author to show them you care. Tweet a Thanks

2 Comments

2 votes
1
2 votes

More Posts

Mastering Java Memory Management: A Comprehensive Guide to JVM Internals, Garbage Collection, and Optimization

Aditya Pratap Bhuyan - May 6

Quarkus: Revolutionizing Java Development for the Cloud-Native Era

Raj Kundalia - Sep 26

Hello World! Welcome to the Java Group!

James Dayal - Sep 25

Why Java Remains the Top Choice for Modern Server Applications

Aditya Pratap Bhuyan - Jun 28

The Secret Weapon for Java Developers Building with AI

myfear - Mar 18
chevron_left