SAP developers are seeing 30% productivity gains with AI tools built for enterprise complexity.

SAP developers are seeing 30% productivity gains with AI tools built for enterprise complexity.

BackerLeader posted 3 min read

SAP Shows How Enterprise AI Development Really Works

The debate about AI replacing developers misses the point. At SAP, AI isn't replacing anyone—it's solving the real problems that slow down enterprise development teams.

Bharat Sandhu, SVP and CMO, SAP Business Technology Platform where thousands of developers build applications that connect to complex SAP systems. His team has moved beyond basic code completion to something more practical: AI that understands enterprise context.

The Context Problem

Most AI coding tools work fine for standalone applications. But enterprise development is different. When a developer wants to access a general ledger, the AI needs to know which database to query, what records to examine, and how that connects to supply chain or HR systems.

"Context is what differentiates and what matters," Sandhu says. "It's not just the context of the application code. It's the context of your back end systems."

SAP's Joule for Developers handles this through what they call semantic understanding. The tool connects to a knowledge graph that knows what a sales order is and how it relates to customers, inventory, and financial data. This isn't just about writing better code—it's about writing code that actually works in complex business environments.

Making Legacy Code Useful Again

Every enterprise has the same problem: mountains of legacy code written by people who no longer work there. Documentation is sparse. Business rules are buried in decades-old logic.

Joule for Developers tackles this head-on. It can read existing code and explain not just what the code does, but which SAP tables it accesses and how it connects to business processes. It can refactor old code to make it more maintainable and generate documentation so future developers don't face the same problems.

"The biggest challenge customers have is a lot of legacy code," Sandhu explains. "People wrote code, and then they retired, and now you have these monolithic applications."

The Developer Response Surprised Everyone

SAP expected resistance from experienced developers and enthusiasm from newcomers. What happened was the opposite.

Initially, senior developers were skeptical while junior developers got excited about AI assistance. But that pattern flipped. Experienced developers realized they could focus on architecture while AI handled routine tasks. They also knew how to use these tools more effectively.

"The advanced developers became bigger fans and use it much more effectively," Sandhu says. "They know what good looks like."

This mirrors what happened with low-code platforms. Developers initially rejected them as beneath their skills, then adopted them when project demands became overwhelming.

Agent-Based Development Changes Everything

SAP has moved beyond code completion to what Sandhu calls agent-based development. Instead of writing individual functions, developers can describe complete business applications.

Tell the system you want an invoice processing application that flags payments overdue by 90 days from specific suppliers and regions. The AI creates the data model, builds the business logic, and handles the user interface.

This isn't magic. The code still goes through testing and human review. But it shifts developer time from writing basic CRUD operations to solving actual business problems.

Why Most AI Projects Fail

Sandhu has seen plenty of failed AI implementations. The pattern is always the same: companies treat AI as an experimental side project instead of core business transformation.

"Most customers work on the fringes of systems," he says. "To really use AI innovatively, you have to change core processes. You have to work inside out from business systems."

Successful companies don't create AI innovation labs. They integrate AI into existing workflows that already generate revenue. They change how they make products, serve customers, or run operations.

"It's easier to change an existing business model and make it better than to create a new project with a new business model on the side," Sandhu explains.

The Enterprise Advantage

Consumer AI tools train on public code repositories. Enterprise AI tools need different training data and different security models. SAP hosts its own models and never uses customer data for training. The code AI generates goes through multiple validation layers before reaching developers.

This enterprise focus creates opportunities for new types of applications. Sandhu mentions compliance systems that understand spending patterns in ways rule-based systems never could. Travel booking agents that negotiate across multiple vendors within budget constraints. Applications that were too complex to build before AI became practical.

What's Next

The speed of change makes long-term predictions difficult. But Sandhu sees clear short-term trends. Development teams will reorganize around AI capabilities. Requirements documentation will become more important as natural language interfaces improve. Agents will write and deploy code based on performance metrics.

His advice for developers is simple: start now. Don't wait on the sidelines. The tools are ready, the productivity gains are real, and the competitive advantage goes to teams that learn these workflows first.

The question isn't whether AI will change enterprise development. At SAP, it already has.

If you read this far, tweet to the author to show them you care. Tweet a Thanks

Really impressive article, I appreciate how clearly you explained SAP’s practical approach to integrating AI into enterprise development. It’s refreshing to see the focus on context and collaboration rather than replacement. Do you think smaller companies without SAP’s infrastructure can adopt similar AI-driven workflows effectively?

Thanks for the question. You've hit on something really interesting. Based on my conversations with companies across different sizes, I think smaller companies actually have some significant advantages here.

SAP has to solve for massive complexity - hundreds of interconnected systems, decades of legacy code, and enterprise-grade security requirements. That's why they need specialized models and knowledge graphs. But smaller companies can often achieve similar productivity gains with simpler approaches.
The key differentiator isn't the sophistication of the AI tools - it's what Bharat mentioned working "inside out from business systems." Smaller companies can identify their core revenue-generating processes and apply AI there without navigating layers of enterprise bureaucracy.

From my Abby Connect interviews (https://coderlegion.com/5492/one-small-company-built-successful-with-five-software-engineers-heres-what-companies-miss?show=5492#q5492), the pattern seems to be: start with one specific workflow, get comfortable with the technology, then expand. They don't need SAP's enterprise infrastructure to see real results.

The challenge for smaller companies is different - they often lack the dedicated resources to properly implement and maintain AI workflows. But they make up for it with speed and flexibility. They can pivot quickly when something doesn't work, which larger enterprises struggle with.

What I find most encouraging is that the core principles apply regardless of company size: focus on existing business processes, maintain human oversight, and integrate AI into your actual workflow rather than treating it as a side experiment.

Have you seen this play out in your own experience with smaller organizations?

More Posts

AI agents handle routine tasks so developers can focus on innovation and strategic work.

Tom Smith - Sep 10

Your Prompts Are Basically Drunk Texts to AI (And That’s Why They Suck)

Yash - Sep 26

Snyk just made security invisible to developers—AI writes secure code without them thinking about it

Tom Smith - Aug 11

AI isn't replacing developers, it's turning them into system orchestrators and strategic thinkers.

Tom Smith - Jul 23

AI Stack for Solo Developers: Build an Entire Startup with These Tools

Ijeoma JahsWay - Aug 11
chevron_left