Nice point in the article about wrapping MERGE and EF work in the same transaction to avoid partial state. In what cases would you personally still default to the simpler update plus insert style instead of trusting MERGE?
⚔️ The Mighty MERGE: Using SQL Merge Statements Safely with EF Core
SpyrosLeader
posted
3 min read
3 Comments
Spyros
•
MERGE is awesome for batch syncs it lets you handle inserts, updates, and deletes all in one go, perfect for ETL or staging jobs.
But for single-row stuff, I still go with the classic UPDATE;
IF @@ROWCOUNT=0 INSERT` approach.
It’s way safer under concurrency, easier to debug, and doesn’t run into MERGE’s weird deadlocks.
Your triggers and audits behave as expected, and retries are simple.
Bottom line: use MERGE for batches, not per-row ops and always throw in a HOLDLOCK for safety.
Spyros
•
Please log in to add a comment.
Please log in to comment on this post.
More Posts
- © 2026 Coder Legion
- Feedback / Bug
- Privacy
- About Us
- Contacts
- Premium Subscription
- Terms of Service
- Refund
- Early Builders
chevron_left
More From Spyros
Related Jobs
- Senior Data Scientist - GenAI/Python/AWS/SQLUnum Group · Full time · Springfield, IL
- Oracle SQL/Python DeveloperPerfict Global, Inc. · Full time · Sacramento, CA
- Backend Ab Initio / PL-SQL Developer 100% onsiteRIT Solutions · Full time · Gwynn Oak, MD
Commenters (This Week)
ag_wizai
2 comments
alejandrotg-code
1 comment
melasistema
1 comment
Contribute meaningful comments to climb the leaderboard and earn badges!